Intermittent fasting: what it actually changes
One label, several practices, one shared principle: moving when you eat. What matched-calorie comparisons actually show.
Read the articleThe word “fasting” covers practices that share neither a duration, nor a set of constraints, nor a level of risk. Compressing your meals into eight hours and going several days without drinking do not belong to the same category, however close the vocabulary makes them sound.
Each page below covers one practice: what it actually involves, what is known and unknown about its effects, its risks, and the profiles for whom it is inadvisable. One reference point holds across all of them — what determines weight is total intake against total expenditure, not the hours you choose to eat in. You can estimate that expenditure with our calorie calculator and place your weight with the BMI calculator.
One label, several practices, one shared principle: moving when you eat. What matched-calorie comparisons actually show.
Read the articleThe way into intermittent fasting: sixteen hours without intake, eight to eat. What the window changes, and what it does not.
Read the articleTwo hours more than 16/8, for a gain that is not proportional. Where returns start diminishing, and what it costs in protein.
Read the articleThe Warrior Diet came from an intuition, not a laboratory. Four hours to cover a full day of needs: hunger is not the real obstacle.
Read the articleOne meal a day. The difficulty everyone assumes — going without food — is not the one that makes the practice fail.
Read the articleFive ordinary days, two at sharply reduced intake. Restriction plays out across the week, which changes how it must be judged.
Read the articleThe most trialled protocol in controlled conditions, and among the least sustained in real life. That gap is the subject.
Read the articleTwenty-four hours, dinner to dinner. The threshold is symbolic: nothing in the body flips at midnight.
Read the articleThe phrase has no settled medical definition. Behind the word sits one real idea — the substrate switch — and a great deal of marketing.
Read the articleEating while chasing the effects of fasting. A protocol born in a laboratory, turned into a commercial product: two different things.
Read the articleThe point where fasting stops being a daily habit and becomes an event. What that shift involves in practice.
Read the articleTwo days without intake. From here the question is no longer willpower but water and electrolyte balance.
Read the articleThree days. The difficulty is not where you expect: the most delicate moment of a 72-hour fast is its ending.
Read the articleThe umbrella term for everything lasting beyond a few days. What unites these practices is not a method but a level of risk.
Read the articleWater, and nothing else. Not a slimming method but a risky practice, whose place is under medical supervision.
Read the articleThe only variant that removes water too. That is what separates it from the others, and what makes comparison misleading.
Read the articleA fast conducted in a clinical setting, with assessment and monitoring. What defines it is not its length but its supervision.
Read the articleThe word detox has no medical definition. What the body clears, it already clears — and the organ doing it needs no cleanse.
Read the articleAn intake made almost entirely of liquid sugars. The name says fasting; the physiology says otherwise.
Read the articleA fast where you drink a salted broth. What that changes for hunger, for sodium, and why it is already not a fast.
Read the article